Response To R. Albert Mohler: Do Infants Who Die Go To Heaven?
R. Albert Mohler, of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, wrote an article proclaiming that infants do indeed go to Heaven on the basis of:
- “We believe that Scripture does indeed teach that all persons who die in infancy are among the elect.”
- “…the Bible teaches that we are to be judged on the basis of our deeds committed ‘in the body’ (2 Corinthians 5:10). That is, we will face the judgment seat of Christ and be judged, not on the basis of original sin, but for our sins committed during our own lifetimes.”
- “…the Bible does not teach that we will answer for Adam’s sin. We will answer for our own. But what about infants? Have those who die in infancy committed such sins in the body? We believe not.”
- “The key issue here is that God specifically exempted from the judgment those who “have no knowledge of good or evil” because of their age. These “little ones” would inherit the Promised Land, and would not be judged on the basis of their fathers’ sins (based upon Deuteronomy 1:39).”
- “We believe that this passage bears directly on the issue of infant salvation, and that the accomplished work of Christ has removed the stain of original sin from those who die in infancy. Knowing neither good nor evil, these young children are incapable of committing sins in the body â?? are not yet moral agents â?? and die secure in the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ.”
- “Jesus instructed his disciples that they should “Permit the children to come to Me; do not hinder them; for the Kingdom of God belongs to such as these (Mark 10:14).” We believe that our Lord graciously and freely received all those who die in infancy â?? not on the basis of their innocence or worthiness â?? but by his grace, made theirs through the atonement He purchased on the cross.”
I was disappointed to read this article as I have found Dr. Mohler’s commentary very Biblical in the past. He first rejects the argument that a reformed individual might utilize: “Some persons may simply suggest that elect infants go to heaven, while the non-elect do not, and must suffer endless punishment. [This answer] is unsatisfactory.”
The problem with Mohler’s argument is that it stems on the foundation that all infants are of the elect due to the assumption that infants commit no sins in the body (fashioned around reasoning that infants cannot discern between good and evil), and they are not held accountable for original sin. This argument, that is the lack of responsibility of original sin, reminds me of the Pelagian denial of original sin. By saying we are not accountable for our representative Adam’s transgression likens the logic that we were never imputed (and then imparted) with his sin in the first place. To imply such a suggestion would mean that we are born depraved, but we do “sin for judgement” until we sin in the body (Pelagian, not in a direct sense, but a hypothetical “blank slate”).
He will render to each one according to his works: to those who by patience in well-doing seek for glory and honor and immortality, he will give eternal life; but for those who are self-seeking and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, there will be wrath and fury. There will be tribulation and distress for every human being who does evil, the Jew first and also the Greek, but glory and honor and peace for everyone who does good, the Jew first and also the Greek. For God shows no partiality.
Romans 2:6–11For when Gentiles who do not have the Law do instinctively the things of the Law, these, not having the Law, are a law to themselves, in that they show the work of the Law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them,
Romans 2:14–15Now we know that whatever the Law says, it speaks to those who are under the Law, so that every mouth may be closed and all the world may become accountable to God; because by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified in His sight; for through the Law comes the knowledge of sin.
Romans 3:19–20
And Mohler cannot deny, as a reformed theologian, that the infant is born completely depraved and acts out of his sinful volition (Ecclesiastes 9:3). And everything not out of faith is indeed sin (Romans 14:23). Mohler affirms original sin and it’s bearing on human kind: “…the Bible reveals that we are “brought forth in iniquity,” (Psalm 51:5) and thus bear the stain of original sin from the moment of our conception.”
‘Moreover, your little ones who you said would become a prey, and your sons, who this day have no knowledge of good or evil, shall enter there, and I will give it to them and they shall possess it.
Deuteronomy 1:39
I believe this verse refers more to the context of allowing the younger generation the opportunity their fathers forfeited (in a finite sense). Mohler’s argument begs the question of the very transgression Adam (and Eve) committed in the Garden: “…you will be like God, knowing good and evil” (Genesis 3:5).
Lastly, Mark 10:14 serves more to illustrate the very qualities that Jesus perceives as necessary for salvation, that being “child-like” faith and not that: “our Lord graciously and freely received all those who die in infancy â?? not on the basis of their innocence or worthiness â?? but by his grace, made theirs through the atonement He purchased on the cross.” The following verse in Psalms has weight in this issue (although not dealt with by Mohler or Piper).
The wicked are estranged from the womb; they go astray from birth, speaking lies.
Psalms 58:3
This question is a controversial and highly emotional one to wrestle with, although we must remember we cannot attempt to assume a truth from the Bible. The Bible teaches we are born with Adam’s sin (Romans 5:12) and thereby accountable (Galatians 6:7) . Those who receive salvation are those that God the Father chose (Ephesians 1:4), that Jesus Christ died for (John 17:9–10), and the Holy Spirit calls (1 Timothy 6:12) and secures (1 Peter 5:8–10). I don’t know who is a part of the elect (cf. Hyper-Calvinism), nor do I desire to know. Wait, maybe the Open Theists know…
This is a good rebuttal to brother Mohler’s. I too disagree with brother Mohler’s article and will put together some thoughts stating why. This just goes to show that reformed theology is not quite reformed enough — still sounds very Romanish to me when the extent of depravity is denied leaving the dead and trespasses and sins just “tainted” with original sin. I thought being spiritually dead meant that you were separated from God and that His wrath abided on you. Since when is there more that one way to be saved? 1) Repentance and faith as a gift of God and 2) Dying in infancy and never coming to either repentance and faith by the grace of God. Who, by the way, is able to keep His elect alive until the day of their preordained salvation by those very means. If Mohler’s “gospel” (and there is not another) for infants were true then we should openly praise the abortion on demand movement as the greatest evangelical tool to date. We too should kill all of our children and all that we can find to kill before they leave this state of just being “tainted”. I guess all of the Hittite children that the Lord had killed are in Heaven too… Pastor Morgan
So would that be your answer to the 30 year old women who comes to you having had 3 miscarriages and suffering from depression?
You are right, this is a sensitive issue and having friends (very close friends) who have had miscarriages it’s not an easy one to just spout out scripture and tell them that their child is not a part of the elect. We must be very careful in how we address this issue not because it is necessarily ‘sensitive’ but because it is a real hurt in the lives of our church body.
I don’t dare make my theological stance so hastily and quickly. I may take years to be fully convinced either way but as a shepherd of the flock I will not be hasty but must understand the scriptures and how they apply to the caring of souls.
Certainly, Mohler may make some incorrect use of Scripture (such as his exegesis of Mark 10:14).
But your critique shows an alarming amount of eagerness to discern who is and is not part of the elect. While claiming that you neither know nor desire to know, you make necessary and sufficent categories for salvation, which are not so clearly-defined in Scripture. Certainly, we can only come to God through Christ: but can anyone explain exactly how?
Your response–as well as Pastor Morgan’s pretty bizarre one–show a lack of sensitivity and willingness to allow God to act as He will.
No, we didn’t show a lack of sensitivity, but we show a concern for how that doctrine has found such widespread acceptance among Reformed evangelicals. I’m not saying that I can discern who is a part of the elect (before their conversion), but I can discern whether they are genuienly saved and thereby prove their election sure (2 Pet 1:10 KJV).
Yes we can know how God saves us through Christ. Jesus tells us in John 6:44.
Well, I’m certainly thankful that none of you guys are my pastor, as one who has, not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4…but yes, 13 children who are all at home with the Lord. No, there are not two ways to salvation. Salvation has always been by grace. Although the text doesn’t outright say it, 2 Sam. 12:23 suggest strong evidence for those who die before birth or in infancy, or perhaps even in childhood will be in heaven. Other evidence within the Bible leads to the same conclusion, such as the Bible’s clear teaching that God cares for children (see Matt. 18:1–6; 19:13–15). These verses don’t state that children go to heaven but they certainly show us God’s great love for children. The psalmist reminds us that God is “full of compassion and gracious, longsuffering and abundant in mercy and truth” (Ps. 86:15). He is the God who became flesh that He might carry our sins away by His death on the cross (2 Cor. 5:21). He is the God who will comfort Christians in heaven, for “He will wipe away every tear from their eyes; there shall be no more death; nor sorrow, nor crying. There shall be no more pain” (Rev. 21:4). We can be assured that God will do what is right and loving because He is the standard of rightness and love. Those considerations alone seem to be evidence enough of God’s particular, electing love shown to the unborn and those who die young. However, another point may be helpful in answering this question. While infants and children have neither sensed their personal sin and need for salvation nor placed their faith in Christ, Scripture teaches that condemnation is based on the clear rejection of God’s revelationâ??whether general or specificâ??not simple ignorance of it (Luke 10:16; John 12:48; 1 Thess. 4:8). Can we definitely say that the unborn and young children have comprehended the truth displayed by God’s general revelation that renders them “without excuse” (Rom. 1:18–20)? They will be judged according to the light they received. Scripture is clear that children and the unborn have original sinâ??including both the propensity to sin as well as the inherent guilt of original sin. But could it be that somehow Christ’s atonement did pay for the guilt for these helpless ones throughout all time? Yes, and therefore it is a credible assumption that a child who dies at an age too young to have made a conscious, willful rejection of Jesus Christ will be taken to be with the Lord. Finally, let me say, it is clear that most folks don’t think about these issues, unless they have personally experienced them. It is sad that some are quick to jump on some theological bandwaggon rather than just admit that there are some things we will not fully know the answers to this side of heaven. However, althought the Bible offers us no explicit answer, we know based on several passages, as well as an understanding of God’s character and His dealings with men, we can develop a good idea of how He works in such situations. Furthermore, it is interesting to me in Scripture that Jesus never called for a decision from children, it was always adults. Finally, let me just say if you guys are preparing for ministry, particularly the pastoral ministry, that you continue to study to show yourself approved, but do not forget the words of Paul, “If I have the gift of prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge; and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing.”
Amen, Scott!
Thanks, Scott. My sentiments, exactly!