Improve Your Theological Vocabulary
I found this from the latest issue of Modern Reformation magazine. First, think of 4 numbers ranging from 0 — 9. Then go to this website, and apply your numbers in each of the columns. You then get an interesting combination that will surely impress anyone. I’ve got so many people fooled into thinking that I know what I’m talking about. Please post your sentence, and if you want what you think it means!
The number series I chose was 4, 7, 2, 5; and here is the result.
There can be no doubt that the introduction of gnosticism imposes smothering constraints upon any attempt to introduce historical analysis.
Well, I don’t think gnosticism is responsible for constraining historical analysis, but they surely have a distorted theology (cf. 1 Tim 6:20; 1 John).
This is just what I needed…thank you.
;)
From an exegetical point of view the underlying question calls into question the unfortunate faux-pas of neo-orthodoxy.
( Who said that? Was that me? I don’t even know what the heck half of those words mean.)
Haha. I hope the others are as funny as that one.
Under the guise of liberalism, the introduction of gnosticism must give way to the clarity of the sociological dimensions.
Wow.
From an exegetical point of view a structural dynamic analysis is further compounded by considering excessive use of the 19th century frameworks.
Which of course means complete rubbish.
Becky is turning britified like me! woohoo!
I just realized that Chris sounds so smart because he spend so much time at this site!!! I totally understand him just a little bit more than I did before!!