The Necessity of Scripture

The doc­trine of Scrip­ture is such a vital point of any reli­gion. With­out the author­ity of some means of Scrip­ture then they have noth­ing to point to in saying that “God said this…” In the amount of Scrip­tures I have read: The Book of Mormon, Qur’an, Bha­ga­vata, Tao Te Ching, and so on all prove to have no life in them; and it has led me to the pur­suit of God’s true Word.

Of all the Scrip­tures I’ve read I am con­sis­tently more and more con­vinced that the Chris­t­ian Scrip­tures are the true, author­i­ta­tive source of knowl­edge. I believe that we must rec­og­nize that there is truth out­side of the Bible, but the Bible serves as our ulti­mate source of author­ity, and rec­og­niz­ing that truth exists out­side of the Bible does not vio­late Sola Scrip­tura as John Frame elaborates:

‘Sola Scrip­tura, after all, does not require the exclu­sion of all extra­bib­li­cal data, even from the­ol­ogy. It simply requires that in the­ol­ogy and in all other dis­ci­plines, the high­est author­ity, the supreme stan­dard, be Scrip­ture and Scrip­ture alone.’
John Frame, Apolo­get­ics to the Glory of God (pg. 18)

Until recently I’ve never been con­vinced by argu­ments of the suf­fi­ciency of the Scrip­tures by rhetoric that fol­lows that line of argu­men­ta­tion, “the Bible speaks to me dif­fer­ently than any­thing else.” I had closed off my feel­ing of the Bible for the sake of knowl­edge. Wayne Grudem in his Sys­tem­atic The­ol­ogy gives this line of argu­men­ta­tion in his chap­ter on the doc­trine of Scripture.

It is one thing to affirm that the Bible claims to be the words of God. It is another thing to be con­vinced that those claims are true. Our ulti­mate con­vic­tion that the words of the Bible are God’s words comes only when the Holy Spirit speaks in and through the words of the Bible to our hearts and gives us an inner assur­ance that these are the words of our Cre­ator speak­ing to us.
Wayne Grudem, Sys­tem­atic The­ol­ogy (pg. 77)

Paul talks in 1 Corinthi­ans about the neces­sity of the Holy Spirit to illu­mi­nate spir­i­tual truths and how the nat­ural man will not accept spir­i­tual truths.

Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, so that we may know the things freely given to us by God, which things we also speak, not in words taught by human wisdom, but in those taught by the Spirit, com­bin­ing spir­i­tual thoughts with spir­i­tual words. But a nat­ural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are fool­ish­ness to him; and he cannot under­stand them, because they are spir­i­tu­ally appraised.
1 Corinthi­ans 2:12-14

This is a writ­ing of appre­ci­a­tion for (1) the Spirit which leads us in dis­cov­er­ing truth and main­tain­ing our per­se­ver­ance and (2) the preser­va­tion of God’s Word so that we may have the words of our Cre­ator Him­self. They illu­mi­nate and give life to a dead spirit. I’m not sure of much, but I’m sure that when some­one reads the Bible eagerly seek­ing to know what it says it will change your life.

As a final point this is why we need to sup­port pro­grams like Wycliffe’s Vision 2025 which strives to have God’s Word avail­able in every lan­guage by 2025. The Great Com­mis­sion can never be fin­ished with­out this task being com­pleted. There are still 380 mil­lion people with­out any of God’s Word.

Activity

4 total comments, leave your comment.
  1. This is not meant to be a smart-​alecky ques­tion at all .. actu­ally I’m being gen­uine and I’m not trying to pick a fight or any­thing like that either. My ques­tion is this — what do you say to some­one who says, “Yes, well, I think GOD is the high­est author­ity .. not scripture”?

  2. Hi Simon,

    I was at a con­fer­ence so I’m just now get­ting to this. It’s not a smart-​aleck ques­tion. Well, to be honest I’ve never heard such a ques­tion, because the Scrip­tures act as God’s source of instruc­tion and author­ity. It would almost be hyp­o­crit­i­cal to say that God is a higher author­ity that Scrip­ture, because God ordained that those words be writ­ten and pre­served for the very pur­pose of instruct­ing His people. That’s all I got on that one.

  3. I see your point about the Bible being God’s intended mech­a­nism of com­mu­ni­cat­ing His will to His crea­tures, and I would agree that it is writ­ten pre­cisely how He intended it to be (and that He is able to see that this is so in virtue of His being Sov­er­eign).

    Having said that, the ques­tion of Author­ity is what I am con­cerned about. What is the high­est author­ity? When I say “highest authority” I am think­ing of some­thing like, “the source”. It seems to me that God and the Bible are two sep­a­rate enti­ties. I’m sure we agree there.

    Regard­ing which is “higher” than the other.. I think we also (upon think­ing about it) would agree that either God is higher than the Bible or that the Bible is higher than God or that they are on equal foot­ing. I think I can make sev­eral con­vinc­ing argu­ments to the effect that God is higher than the Bible.. argu­ments in light of God’s being a Person (and the Bible’s being an inan­i­mate object), etc.

    It seems to me that God is the source.. the cre­ator.. of the Bible. It seems that the Bible is an effect – a prod­uct of – a cre­ated thing.

    I am fully aware that “in the begin­ning was the Word, and the Word was God..” but I do not think John is there equat­ing what he calls the Logos with what we call the Bible. I think he’s talk­ing about Jesus Christ – I think he’s talk­ing about the second Person of the Trin­ity. As God, Jesus Christ, the Word, is the source of the word (the Bible). I’m sure that we agree. I am just clar­i­fy­ing.

  4. For the sake of clar­i­fi­ca­tion I would agree. Actu­ally, this is a good ques­tion that is often dealt with between the debate between the ces­sa­tion and con­tin­u­a­tion of spir­i­tual gifts (regard­ing rev­e­la­tion).

Leave a Reply