The Essential Christian Beliefs
One of the greatest struggles in the Christian faith is clearly defining what exactly one must believe in order to be saved and a member of Christ's church. There is much confusion, especially in our postmodern, relativistic culture, that to be a "Christian" becomes leaner and leaner. When this accumulates, then all of the sudden Christians think and act the same as the world.
One of the other things I want to note is that most lay people don't worry about things such as this, and they also tend to despise denominationalism. Christians who struggle with this are those who have deep theological convictions, and these Christians find themselves in a denominational church out of conviction. This list is at the lowest common denominator; the sine qua non or "without which it could not be." This is a hard topic, and I hope that my readers will contribute their thoughts on this topic.
If you hold these beliefs that doesn't necessarily believe you had "good theology," but these faiths are minimum that I believe the Scriptures teach that one needs to hold in order to be saved. Jesus says that "unless you are converted and become like children, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven" (Mat 18:3), and this reflects the humble, child-like, basic belief we must have. This does not believe that I believe in "doctrinal regeneration," but I do think the Scriptures speaks to this list.
Essential Christian Beliefs
» The Existence of God. This seems rather obvious, but I ran into the practicality of this when I met a self-proclaimed "Atheistic Christian." The Bible doesn't provide an apologetic for the existence of God'it assumes it.
» The Deity of Jesus Christ. If Jesus is not God then he could not be sinless, serve as our sacrificial lamb, and then he would not have raised from the dead. This also includes pre-existence of Christ.
» The Atonement of Jesus Christ. By this I don't mean that we have a "limited" or "unlimited" view on the scope of the atonement, but I do mean that we believe that Jesus did pay for their sins in order to appease a holy God.
» The Resurrection of Jesus Christ. This is the cornerstone of Christianity, and Paul lays this out in 1 Corinthians 15. Without the resurrection Christianity is futile, and we are still in our sins.
What About...?
» Justification By Faith Alone. This is probably the most difficult one, because it lies on the line between Catholics and Protestants. Even though I think it is a hallmark of orthodoxy, I cannot say this is "salvation essential;" because of the book of Galatians. Paul rebukes the Galatians for trusting in their following of the Mosaic Law (Gal 3:1-4); these Christians were saved in Paul's mind, but they had a terrible misunderstanding. 1
» The Inerrancy of Scripture. Does the Bible ever say that one must believe in one or another view of inerrancy defining that to the letter? No. The truth is that the only inerrant Scriptures were those that the authors wrote by the leading of the Holy Spirit, and we have none of those manuscripts today. That means that we trust the process of textual criticism and the faithfulness of God to preserve his message for his people.
» The Trinity. This is also a huge sticking point, but I would put this in the area of beliefs that there may be a misunderstanding in the beginning; but I think it is a belief that should be in a mature Christian. There are so many nuances in this, and the church has battled heresies through the history of the church. The question is: How much should we understand concerning the ontological nature of God in order to be saved?
» The Hypostatic Union. This is the unity of Jesus' (post resurrection) divine and human nature as being "conjoined but not confused." It certainly must be true that he had to become human in order to secure our bodily resurrection and that he could be our high priest. This is an understanding that can come with doctrinal mentoring and correction.
» The Holy Spirit. Now I'm not saying we can overtly deny the existence of the Holy Spirit, but I can say that we can have a misguided view in both our understanding of the Holy Spirit in his role in the Godhead and his role in both regeneration and sanctification.2
Resources
I listened to two good talks from a radio show called "Theology UnPlugged" on this very issue. I suggest the talks, because they speak in humility and wrestle with the issues honestly.
- Now I do believe that if you continue to believe this after studying the Scriptures for an extended amount of time then I would call into question their faith, because this doctrine summarizes that we are saved by grace alone, through faith alone, by the work of Christ alone. [Back]
- My pastor right now is doing a good sermon series on the basics of pneumatology or the doctrine of the Holy Spirit. He realizes that we very well can be saved and have a misunderstanding on this doctrine. [Back]
May 19th 2007
Chris,
This is something I have been struggling with tremendously!!! As you know, I have been involved in formulating a statement of faith for an ecumenical Christian umbrella organization on campus. In doing so we formulated a statement of faith with seven basic beliefs. When we drafted this statement of faith we were amazed how much backlash we received from various other Christian organizations when we presented our constitution to the University.
It is interesting to note that our statement of faith includes all of the points you mention as both essential and non-essential (including the hypostatic-union, although not by name) plus a mention of heaven and hell. This has been something I have been seriously struggling with recently. Yes, I agree that all of the first points are essential for salvation but I would lean toward saying that a belief in the Trinity is also necessary (although I am not ready to make a strong defense at this point).
In theory this organization is meant to combine efforts of various organizations for the sake of reaching the campus with prayer and the gospel. The question we face is how ecumenical can we be before we begin to sacrifice the truth of the gospel? I have agonized over this as you know. I have prepared a post for your Forum that I will add in the next day or two on this topic. -psp
May 19th 2007
@Perry: I appreciate that honest reflection, and I know you have worked through this issue quit a bit recently. The only reason I put trinity in the second-tier was, because I think many believers can have an incorrect view on what the trinity is. I should say that I think with maturity this should change.
I look forward to your thread.
May 19th 2007
Chris, your four essentials are definitely essential.
The fourth one - the Resurrection - is one I like to really unpack when someone is asking me about the essential beliefs of Christianity.
The reason I am concerned about it is that it is the cornerstone, and as such it is under the most attack by Satan and those people he inspires.
The Providence Church, for example, lead by Jung Myung Seok, redefines the Resurrection as a spiritual event alone. This allows them to say that the messiah for this time period is Jung. Disturbing.
May 19th 2007
@Simon: I have heard of that cult, but I don't know that much about it. It's amazing how disturbing that truly is.
May 19th 2007
You know what's weird to me is that I have heard little (from pastors lately) about why the bodily Resurrection is so important. Maybe we should start a forum topic on this.
May 19th 2007
@Simon: Go for it. I have written on this in the past.
May 20th 2007
@Simon - Southern Seminary magazine recently did a full magazine devoted to the importance and defense of the resurrection. You can access it at:
http://www.sbts.edu/pdf/tie/2007Spring.pdf
May 21st 2007
When Jesus speaks of "how to be saved" he doesn't mention any of the above four principles directly. In fact, He doesn't even refer to Himself as the source of this salvation very much (in the synoptic gospels). He says things like "your faith has made you well." He clearly implies the first principle: the existence of God (because their faith is in God). But it's not until you get to John or Paul's explanatory epistles that you learn "the details." So, I do wonder whether a person truly needs to understand that Jesus is God, at the time that he's saved, and whether he needs to truly understand principles three and four. It's preferable that a person understands; but we're asking what is necessary, not preferable.
I've been very confused why Jesus - the cornerstone of my faith and God Himself - is as vague as He is (in the synoptics) when people ask Him about eternal life. He tells the rich young ruler to DO things, not BELIEVE things (although you could say belief is implicit in doing).
Anyway, yes, this topic has been on my mind also - what is essential? About the only thing you see in scripture, repeatedly, is "Believe in the name of the Lord Jesus and you will be saved." If more was important (read "necessary") wouldn't it have been stated?