The Growing in Grace Cult Revisited

Since I first posted about Creciendo en Gracia or "Growing in Grace" I have had no post that it is more popular. It leads, by far in hits, comments, and searches. In fact, if you search Google for "Growing in Grace" my post shows up second right after his own site! I also added the article to his Wikipedia entry, and the hits have only gone up. Miranda has continued to promulgate his heretical theology leading many astray, and a recent act he did prompted me to write against him again.

Miranda Claims to be the Antichrist

Miranda with 666Miranda came out recently with a tattoo of "666" upon him, and now his followers are following suit and doing the same. He claims to be "the" antichrist; he says the following (see the video):

"666 antichrist means do not put your eyes on Jesus Christ of Nazareth put it on Jesus after the cross."

He also claims that the translation we have of "antichrist" is incorrect as it should be the "new Christ." This is beyond imagination. I am not going to re-hash content that I have already written about theological outlining the doctrine of the antichrist, because I have already done so in my "Man of Sin" series (part 1, 2). I do, however, want to spend some time reflecting on what the number 666 means in Biblical terminology.

The Mysterious 666

Here is the passage in which this mysterious number shows up.

"Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for the number is that of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six." (Rev 13:18)

A popular opinion among orthodox Christians is that the Greek form of Nero Caesar translated into Hebrew is the mathematical sum of 666. In some Latin texts the number is translated at 616 which is the numerical equivalent of Nero's Latinized name in Hebrew. Kim Riddlebarger gives another important rationale behind this specific number.

"The meaning of the number is at least as significant as identifying to who it applies. The number of man, 666, is 'perfectly imperfect' in contrast to the number of perfection'seven. The thrice repeated number '6' implies endless work without rest. The creational pattern was for humans to work for six days and then rest on the seventh as did the Creator. But in this case, those who take the mark of the beast work endlessly and never do enter the hoped-for Sabbath rest."1

This is certainly a plausible interpretation as Nero was the epitome of everything ungodly in the first century, but we must keep in mind that John wrote his epistle after the death of Nero. He actually wrote it during the reign of Domitian. Further, arguments against this interpretation are raised, because this translation is devoid of patristic writings.2 Let us however not miss the forest for the trees on this issue.

Whether the number used by John in his letter referred to Nero or not the point is that this mark is not a good thing to have! In fact, John describes in Rev 20:4 that only those who have not worshiped the beat or "had not received the mark on their forehead" are the only ones who come to life with Christ during the inter-advental age.

Conclusion

I want to stress that regardless of whether the number refers specifically to Nero or all people who operate in the spirit of Nero the point is that embracing the mark of the beast is not a positive thing. Further, Miranda's awful interpretation of this passage only further proves that he is a deceiver and certainly not doing anything of God. We must continue to pray that God will rid the earth of this impostor.

  1. Kim Riddlebarger, The Man of Sin: Uncovering the Truth About the Antichrist (pg. 113) [Back]
  2. Fracis Gumerlock goes at length defending this interpretation showing up in fifth century writings in his article in the WTJ: Gumerlock, Francis X. "Nero Antichrist: Patristic Evidence for the Use of Nero's Name in Calculating the Number of the Beast" (Rev 13:18).' WTJ 68 #2 (2006): 347ff [Back]

Activity

11 total comments, leave your comment.
  1. Perry
    Jun 4th 2007

    As I said on the last post:

    "May the Lord either stop him in his tracks or strike him dead so that he can no longer degrade the Lord's holy name."

  2. Well the only comment I have is regarding your statement that Revelation was written during the time of Domitian. There is more and more evidence that puts all of the New Testament writings as have been completed before 70 AD. See Gentry's before Jerusalem fell.

  3. @Peter: Well, Gentry is a Preterist, and I don't think his dating is correct. Domitian lived until A.D. 96, and I think a date in the 90's is much more likely.

  4. Perry
    Jun 5th 2007

    I would agree that all of the NT was written before 70 AD, especially for the reason of the destruction of the temple which is not mentioned within any of the letters. If any of the letters had been written after 70 AD I would think that the writers would have mentioned this.

  5. @Perry: That's typical Preterist argumentation. However, I think it's misguided.

  6. Perry
    Jun 5th 2007

    Why?

  7. Because I think it can lead to a Preterist understanding of NT prophecy. I have some stuff on this, and we can talk about it more in person.

  8. @ Chris and Perry: What!? Talk about it in person...but I want to know too!!!!

  9. @Gwen: I need to write about this, but I've had enough eschatology for now. To be continued...

  10. Well Chris I'm a preterist also (partial) but frankly I don't think preterism should be a deciding factor when looking at the age of the writings. I could be a historist and still come to the conclusion that the NT were finished before 70 A.D.

    However if you wish to send me anything regarding your views on why the NT is older than 70 A.D. please do not hesitate to email me.

    yours,
    Peter Nelson

  11. BIANCA R.
    Oct 21st 2007

    As a Bible Scholar I have read too many opinions about different denominations; also, different interpretations of the Bible.  Speaking of Growing in Grace and Jose Luis de Jesus Miranda, I can tell you that the movement IS NOT christian, nor a church, it is only that; a movement, a group of followers of one of the men that self proclaimed that he is Jesus Christ.  I decided once for all write about him; that way every people that reads this forum be aware of the doctrines that this group preaches, and how this man lives. First of all, he lives a luxurious life. He drives a BMW, has multiple luxurious residences, he dresses with expensive clothes, wears gold and diamonds jewelry and has a group of bodyguards  who "supposedly" keeps him safe.  If he is Jesus Christ, I don't see why he needs to pay a lot of money to some bodyguards in order to be safe (???!!!). Second, the Bible is a group of books starting in Genesis and ending in the Apocalypse;  it's not ONLY the 14 Paul's Letters.  This group proclaims that only Paul has THE TRUTH and the rest of the Bible is irrelevant.  They call St. Paul's letters The Good News of the Grace. For de Jesus Miranda there is no sin, no devil, no hell, and praying is a waste of time, since his followers are already save.  That means that you can do whatever you want to do because God only looks at our spirits and not our flesh (???!!!) This man and his closest assistants (one of his daughters, Alvaro Albarracin, Carlos Cestero, etc) are highly proselitists, specially in South America, where they try to recruit people and open new "churches" where the officials let them. Did you know that at this time he proclaims himself as the Antichrist?  This man is only a liar, eager of money and praise.  He wants to be the center of attention and, since he has a charismatic personality, he attracts naive and uneducated people who believes in his false doctrines. Since (of course) he's not God, he cannot perform any miracle, nor he can do nothing that you and I will be able to do, he's trying to explain that by twisting a part of the Scriptures, as usual. As a final thought I will like to tell you that stay away not only of that sect, but from any other movement of the same resemblance.  They are very dangerous, as Jim Jone's and David Koresh's groups were (to give you an example). If is in your hands to avoid for somebody to join a group like this one, try to do It, and if you are able to give information of any kind (oral or writing) about all the negative things about a sect or cult, go ahead and do it.  You will be rewarded from  the Only and True God.God bless you all,  Bianca R.      

Leave a Reply

Similar Posts

Post Meta