The Lost Tomb of Jesus?

Pastor Hay­good of Orange Hill Bap­tist Church in Austell, GA recently wrote an arti­cle con­cern­ing the recent “tomb of Jesus” dis­cov­ery. The arti­cle is enti­tled: “The Lost Tomb of Jesus?: A Few Pre­lim­i­nary Reflec­tions.” It is per­ti­nent, con­cise, meek, and accu­rate. It gave me great con­fi­dence in our Risen Savior as all apolo­get­ics should.

“There are very few events of ancient his­tory better attested with sound evi­dence than the bodily res­ur­rec­tion of Jesus Christ. It’s secure in its place in the annals of his­tory, and its evi­dence is suf­fi­ciently impres­sive to demand an answer from every one in the world”

Please take a few moments to read the arti­cle. It will greatly ben­e­fit your faith.

Activity

4 total comments, leave your comment.
  1. I’m very inter­ested in the “sound evidence” he men­tions, do you know of any?

  2. @Alex: You’re right that that state­ment is left a little unqual­i­fied. I haven’t the space to defend the res­ur­rec­tion here. I would sug­gest this arti­cle for your study.

  3. That was an inter­est­ing arti­cle. Thanks for post­ing it.

    From the little I’ve seen of Chris­t­ian reac­tion, it’s been pretty rea­son­able. (Of course, I don’t pay that much attention… this is just what I’ve seen.) When this Jesus Tomb story broke, it appeared to me to be a gen­er­ally unschol­arly “stunt” (as your arti­cle puts it) and I didn’t really see any Chris­tians run­ning around look­ing for cover. So, that’s good. But it does raise some extremely inter­est­ing ques­tions, namely, what exactly is your faith based on? Can that basis even be wholly defined? I was think­ing, after read­ing the arti­cle you posted, that my pre­vi­ous, very long post could seem like an argu­ment for “subjectivistic
    mysticism” (as the guy in your arti­cle says). I cer­tainly did not mean that!! But, I did mean that our faith – from my per­spec­tive – is not based wholly on evi­dence. And it is not based wholly on faith. There’s some odd and unsearch­able com­bi­na­tion of the two that make up our faith. Anyway, that’s my take. I wanted to clar­ify that since I cer­tainly do believe evi­dence is important… it’s just not the whole story.

    Man, I tend to write in an extremely un-​concise fash­ion sometimes… Sorry, it’s late. :-)

  4. @Amanda: You’re right that evi­dence is not the object of our faith as faith is long­ing for things unseen (Heb 11:1). If how­ever some evi­dence con­tra­dicted the premises my faith was laid upon than it is worth a study (cf. last post).

Leave a Reply