What Proposition 8 Proved

This last elec­tion was a dis­cour­ag­ing one for conservatives.  Amer­ica elected, by a wide margin, one of the most lib­eral politi­cians of our time.  His eco­nomic plans border on Social­ism, and he has one of the most pro-​choice voting records during his dura­tion in Congress.  On top of that the Con­gress is now entrenched in lib­er­al­ism in both the Senate and the House.  Con­ser­v­a­tives can also expect lib­eral judge nom­i­na­tions to our nation’s top courts.  Is there any­thing to be opti­mistic to be about?

An Important Sidebar

Before going any fur­ther there is an impor­tant point to bring to light. As Chris­tians we must acknowl­edge that our hope is not in this world, its lead­ers, and poli­cies. We serve a sov­er­eign, mighty God that is work­ing all things to the good of those who love him (Rom 8:28).  To find your­self in immense grief over our polit­i­cal state is to ignore that our focus is to be on the escha­ton and not this world that is pass­ing away (1 Cor 7:31; 1 John 2:17).  Keep in mind also that all rulers and author­i­ties are put into that posi­tion by the will of God (Rom 13).  With that impor­tant note we can move into our discussion.

Proposition 8 and Its Effects

In Cal­i­for­nia, which is known for its lib­eral voting record, passed Propo­si­tion 8 into their state’s con­sti­tu­tion. This amend­ment not only defines legal mar­riages as between one man and one woman, but it also applies retroac­tively to all cur­rent homo­sex­ual mar­riages for­merly sanc­tioned by the state.  In August of this year the state’s high­est court repealed a ban on same-​sex mar­riages which led to the Propo­si­tion 8 vote (as well as a ruling a few years ago legit­imiz­ing same-​sex marriage).  This elec­tion sim­i­lar mea­sures passed in Ari­zona and Florida bring­ing the total to 30 states that have passed sim­i­lar measures.

This last week protests across the coun­try took part in oppos­ing the pas­sage of the act in California.  The pro­test­ers are call­ing on the State’s high court to over­rule the amend­ment as “unconstitutional.”  All this has led to a rev­e­la­tion that many con­ser­v­a­tives have touted for a long time?namely the mis­guided role that judges have in legislation.

It’s become more and more appar­ent in recent times that judges across the coun­try have been leg­is­lat­ing from the bench instead of inter­pret­ing and apply­ing leg­is­la­tion. This amend­ment is par­tic­u­larly impor­tant, because it has brought to light that a few judges (or even one judge) do not and should not speak for the gen­eral populace.  On issues as impor­tant as the def­i­n­i­tion of mar­riage amongst others it is very appar­ent that the pop­u­lace should decide how such an issue is decided.

We all have the ten­dency to love elec­toral results when the out­come is what we desire.  How­ever, lib­er­als have shown more and more that they cannot accept when an out­come doesn’t favor their position.  This con­tra­dic­tory posi­tion is no more evi­dent then the protests sur­round­ing the pas­sage of Propo­si­tion 8. Instead of acqui­esc­ing to the elec­toral results they vow to fight it as long as nec­es­sary for the result they want to come through.

The Beacon of Hope

As con­ser­v­a­tive evan­gel­i­cals we can look at issues like Propo­si­tion 8 and thank God for not allow­ing us to be as wicked as we could be as a nation.  In a time when the GOP is “re-evaluating” their plat­form (trans­la­tion: we need to be more mod­er­ate) we can see this pro­mo­tion of right­eous­ness as an impor­tant victory.  While not the only issue rel­e­vant to evan­gel­i­cals in the cur­rent polit­i­cal land­scape it cer­tainly shows that on the whole we as a nation aren’t as lib­eral as our pop­u­lar media would like us to believe.

The gospel must go forth with or with­out a Repub­li­can pres­i­dent, and noth­ing will inhibit the Spirit of God work­ing in this world for his glory.  We can con­tinue to be kingdom-​minded believ­ers who seek to pro­mote right­eous­ness in the public square and also main­tain our fierce ded­i­ca­tion to the truth that only the gospel  will bring redemp­tion and joy to this fallen world.

Activity

2 total comments, leave your comment.
  1. dianna syed
    Nov 17th 2008

    yu need to prac­tice some love. chris­t­ian and lib­eral are not mutual exclu­sives no matter what the hate mon­gers say. i would prefer gay people write their part­ners into a legal­doc­u­ment known as a will and be sat­is­fied w civil union status. but gay mar­riages do not threaten anyone. our cul­ture at large–adul­tery, promis­cu­ity, mate­ri­al­ism to name a few fac­tors—that is what threat­ens mar­riage today. pride­ful­ness, rejec­tion of Christ. my hus­band had an affair and i would have pre­ferred to divorce him. but he didn’t want to lose his family and his lover didn’t really want to marry him.
    we got back together, but you know he is still very unhappy. he refuses to address the sole causes of his dis­tress. and we do not really have much of a mar­riage. i tried to for­give him and…its a bit of a lost cause. i don’t know how gay mar­riage affects the state of our cul­ture except to act as a focus for haters.

  2. Dianna: I’m sorry you are unhappy with your cur­rent mar­riage sit­u­a­tion. I hope that a res­o­lu­tion is found and you both can be rec­on­ciled.

    The mar­riage issue isn’t simply a prag­matic issue, but for Chris­tians it is a moral issue fun­da­men­tally. By that mea­sure we sup­ported Prop 8.

Leave a Reply